Mike Ross Law Blog

Legal issues: Inside out

29 February 2012

Extradition: USA v. Dotcom

›
Bail conditions creating an personal electronic prison will suffice for individuals held in New Zealand pending extradition. Internet entr...
24 February 2012

Company: Wilson v. Blanchett

›
Any failure to properly document drawings from a closely-held company can result in court orders for repayment. Liquidators of an Auckland...
15 February 2012

Crafar Farms: Tiroa E v. Land Information

›
Interests associated with Sir Michael Fay and David Richwhite are running a canny strategy of disruption against Chinese interests looking t...
20 December 2011

Tax: Tannadyce Investments v. CIR

›
It was an abuse of process for a taxpayer to try and circumvent the prescribed tax disputes process by claiming Inland Revenue was refusing ...

Blue Chip: re Northern Crest Investments

›
Australian investors needed High Court approval to support their claim to three million dollars used to prop up Blue Chip operations in Aus...
12 December 2011

Tax avoidance: Alesco NZ Ltd v. CIR

›
Sixteen different taxpayers and revenue totalling $300 million is in dispute with Inland Revenue as it targets use of hybrid securities to f...
09 December 2011

Bankruptcy: Taylor v. Official Assignee

›
A court ruling that $227,000 be repaid by a family trust following bankruptcy was reversed on appeal when the bankrupt argued that payments...
23 November 2011

Maori: Takamore v. Clarke

›
In disputes over burial custom, it is the executor who has final responsibility for decisions over the manner and place of burial. With a ...
17 November 2011

Infrastructure valuations: Vodafone v. Telecom

›
Valuation of infrastructure assets got an airing in Supreme Court litigation closing out a long running dispute over the cost to Telecom of ...
02 September 2011

Earthquake Insurance: EQC v. Insurance Council

›
Losses following the Canterbury earthquakes have been shifted from the private sector to the Earthquake Commission following a High Court ru...

Nathans Finance: R. v. Moses, Doolan & Young

›
Two directors of Nathans Finance have been jailed for their part in the company’s failure; two others received home detention. Just over on...
29 August 2011

Leaky Homes: Tisch v. Body Corporate 318596

›
Proposals which force owners in leaky apartments to pay over the odds for water damage to other owners’ apartments do not find favour with t...
24 August 2011

Tax avoidance: Penny & Hooper v. CIR

›
Artificially low salaries having the effect of diverting taxable income to other taxpayers on a lower marginal tax rate will be hit as tax a...
16 August 2011

Money laundering: Westpac v. MAP Associates

›
While banks might have legitimate concerns about liability for assisting money laundering, they are not entitled to block money transfers u...
22 July 2011

Export Sales: Smallmon v. Transport Sales

›
Exporters selling into Australia are not directly responsible for ensuring goods comply with Australian regulations. A Queensland buyer ...
12 July 2011

Bridgecorp: R. v. Petricevic

›
There is no injustice in having to do without a lawyer in a criminal trial. Rodney Michael Petricevic, charged with criminal offences foll...
08 July 2011

Nathans Finance: R. v. Moses & others

›
Directors of Nathan Finance have been convicted of misleading the public about the company’s financial position when they failed to disclose...
03 June 2011

Bridgecorp: Petricevic v. Legal Services Agency

›
The family trust of bankrupt Bridgecorp director, Rodney Michael Petricevic, had a net worth of $5.2 million dollars as at March 2009 accord...
27 May 2011

Financial adviser: Armitage v. Church

›
Poor financial advice is not excused simply by having clients complete a risk profile questionnaire. Financial advisers are still obliged ...
19 May 2011

Maori: Haronga v. Waitangi Tribunal

›
Individual hapu can have property rights which differ from iwi-wide claims. The Waitangi Tribunal has been told to exercise its statutory ...
11 May 2011

Share offers: Financial Markets Authority v. Carrington Securities

›
Unsolicited mailshots to small shareholders in listed companies are misleading and deceptive where prominence given to the above-market offe...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Mike Ross
Mike Ross spent nearly thirty years teaching all aspects of commercial law to business students and almost as many years writing variously for The New Zealand Herald, The National Business Review and The Chartered Accountants' Journal. He authored two books on legal principles governing business reconstructions. Mike Ross holds degrees in both law and economics from the University of Auckland.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.