Mike Ross Law Blog
Legal issues: Inside out
23 May 2012
F&I Finance: Eaton & Marshall v. LDC Finance
›
The High Court has ordered that $7.8 million dollars held by LDC Finance supposedly as a secured creditor of failed Nelson finance company...
18 May 2012
Bridgecorp: R. v. Roest
›
Two further Bridgecorp directors convicted of making false statements have been sentenced: Cornelis Robert Roest sentenced to six years si...
09 May 2012
medical negligence: Allenby v. H
›
The medical profession continues to enjoy statutory protection from negligence claims now that a Middlemore hospital surgeon has been held...
27 April 2012
NZF Money: NZF Money v. O'Connor
›
A court-ordered freeze imposed on finance company NZF Money Ltd has been extended to protect investors. But NZF Money is still allowed t...
26 April 2012
Bridgecorp: R. v. Petricevic
›
Rodney Michael Petricevic has been sentenced to six and half years jail for making false statements to Bridgecorp investors. The High Co...
04 April 2012
Company: Stilwell v. Ice Group
›
Minority shareholders in a closely-held company won the battle but lost the war in their attempt to gain a share of business profits gener...
29 March 2012
Lombard: R v. Graham
›
Of the four Lombard directors convicted of Securities Act offences only two were ordered to pay reparations totalling $200,000: one director...
15 March 2012
Milk: Fonterra v. Grate Kiwi Cheese
›
Breaking into the lucrative value-added dairy market does not require ownership of a processing plant. New entrants can demand Fonterra pr...
29 February 2012
Extradition: USA v. Dotcom
›
Bail conditions creating an personal electronic prison will suffice for individuals held in New Zealand pending extradition. Internet entr...
24 February 2012
Company: Wilson v. Blanchett
›
Any failure to properly document drawings from a closely-held company can result in court orders for repayment. Liquidators of an Auckland...
15 February 2012
Crafar Farms: Tiroa E v. Land Information
›
Interests associated with Sir Michael Fay and David Richwhite are running a canny strategy of disruption against Chinese interests looking t...
20 December 2011
Tax: Tannadyce Investments v. CIR
›
It was an abuse of process for a taxpayer to try and circumvent the prescribed tax disputes process by claiming Inland Revenue was refusing ...
Blue Chip: re Northern Crest Investments
›
Australian investors needed High Court approval to support their claim to three million dollars used to prop up Blue Chip operations in Aus...
12 December 2011
Tax avoidance: Alesco NZ Ltd v. CIR
›
Sixteen different taxpayers and revenue totalling $300 million is in dispute with Inland Revenue as it targets use of hybrid securities to f...
09 December 2011
Bankruptcy: Taylor v. Official Assignee
›
A court ruling that $227,000 be repaid by a family trust following bankruptcy was reversed on appeal when the bankrupt argued that payments...
23 November 2011
Maori: Takamore v. Clarke
›
In disputes over burial custom, it is the executor who has final responsibility for decisions over the manner and place of burial. With a ...
17 November 2011
Infrastructure valuations: Vodafone v. Telecom
›
Valuation of infrastructure assets got an airing in Supreme Court litigation closing out a long running dispute over the cost to Telecom of ...
02 September 2011
Earthquake Insurance: EQC v. Insurance Council
›
Losses following the Canterbury earthquakes have been shifted from the private sector to the Earthquake Commission following a High Court ru...
Nathans Finance: R. v. Moses, Doolan & Young
›
Two directors of Nathans Finance have been jailed for their part in the company’s failure; two others received home detention. Just over on...
‹
›
Home
View web version