Mike Ross Law Blog
Legal issues: Inside out
27 June 2014
School Rules: Battison v. Melloy
›
Adolescence is a time for asserting independence and for testing boundaries. In a High Court challenge to rules governing hair length at St...
24 June 2014
Greymouth Petroleum: Sturgess v. Dunphy
›
The Court of Appeal has set parameters for warring parties within dysfunctional Greymouth Petroleum to negotiate the sale of a 13.8 per cen...
16 June 2014
Partnership: Kidd v. Worldwide Leisure
›
A legal spat between two overseas millionaires over ownership of Huka Lodge has returned to the New Zealand courts. Once they were friend...
10 June 2014
Leaky Homes: Osborne v. Auckland City
›
Despite a last-ditch offer of an out of court settlement by Auckland City nervous that the Supreme Court would rule against it in a leaky h...
28 May 2014
Rates: Mangawai Ratepayers v. Kaipara District
›
Mangawhai ratepayers got sympathy but not much more in their High Court challenge to cost blowouts exceeding $20 million on their local sew...
20 May 2014
Mainzeal: Yan v. Mainzeal Ltd
›
Insolvency practitioners chasing down funds for creditors of the Mainzeal Group are having their difficulties pinning down Richard Yan, the...
16 May 2014
Belgrave Finance: R. v. Hamilton
›
Hugh Edward Staples Hamilton, lawyer and former mayor of Central Hawkes Bay, has been convicted of being party to theft by a person in a sp...
12 May 2014
Hanover Finance: Hotchin v. KA No.4 Trust
›
The FMA acted properly and in the public interest when intervening in legal arguments over how much Hanover Finance director Mark Hotchin c...
07 May 2014
Lombard Finance: Graham et al v. R
›
Home detention imposed by the Court of Appeal on former directors of Lombard Finance has been set aside by the Supreme Court. Sentences of...
02 May 2014
Historic places: Lambton Quay Properties v. Wellington City
›
It is easy to spend money when it is other people’s money: a maxim exemplified by the Historic Places Trust claiming domain over earthquake...
30 April 2014
Vexatious litigant: Attorney-General v. Siemer
›
The High Court has declared Vincent Ross Siemer a vexatious litigant. Without first getting court approval, he is barred from taking legal...
09 April 2014
Feltex: Credit Suisse v. Houghton
›
Lack of rules governing class actions has left Feltex shareholders wandering through a maze as they attempt to recover compensation for all...
08 April 2014
Matrimonial property: Thompson v. Thompson
›
Eight million dollars paid in return for a promise not to compete could be retained as separate property when selling a health food busines...
28 March 2014
Professional misconduct: Withers v. NZ Law Society
›
Canterbury barrister and solicitor Murray Ian Withers was disbarred from practice after being found guilty of professional misconduct when ...
26 March 2014
Tax: Yandina Investments v. ANZ
›
Air New Zealand had its wings clipped when it miscalculated the tax effect from purchasing the “tail” of a Boeing 747 lease. Attempts to r...
20 March 2014
Insurance: Skyward Aviation v. Tower Insurance
›
Statements by Tower Insurance that it would always act reasonably when dealing with clients were quickly dismissed by the Court of Appeal. ...
25 February 2014
Insolvency: Grant v. CP Asset Management
›
Court-appointed liquidators were reinstated after allegations that voting on the appointment of a replacement liquidator was rigged to curt...
Negligence: Marchand v. Jackson
›
Failing to arrange insurance cover for clients and then dishonestly stating that he had done so meant an insurance broker was liable for hi...
Bankrupt: Medtronic NZ v. Finch
›
Orthopaedic surgeon Gregory Dale Finch has been ordered to pay $1.08 million for unpaid medical supplies and further ordered to pay extra c...
07 February 2014
Pollution: Auckland Waterfront v. Mobil
›
Auckland ratepayers face a ten million dollar cost to remove contaminated subsoil before completing redevelopment of the Wynyard Quarter, s...
23 December 2013
D&O insurance: BFSL 2007 Ltd v. Steigrad & Houghton v. AIG
›
Company directors everywhere are urgently renegotiating terms of their liability insurance following Supreme Court rulings in the Bridgecor...
‹
›
Home
View web version