Mike Ross Law Blog

Legal issues: Inside out

29 August 2014

Maori: Paki v. Attorney-General

›
Recognising that its ruling might open future political claims by Maori for resource rents on water used to generate hydroelectric power, t...
27 August 2014

Insurance: Ridgecrest v. IAG

›
Policy wording enabled a Christchurch building owner with an underinsured property recover more than the amount nominally insured because a...

Fair Trading: Godfrey Hirst (NZ) v. Cavalier Bremworth

›
The dominant headline message in any advertisement must not be misleading the Court of Appeal ruled.  It is a breach of the Fair Trading Ac...
11 August 2014

Joint Venture: Worldwide v. NZ Venue & Event Management

›
After gaining total management control in 2006 of the 12,000 seat Vector Arena in Auckland, the Australian-based Jacobsen family has cheerf...
30 July 2014

Asset freeze: Twentieth Century Fox v. Dotcom

›
Kim Dotcom has been forced to disclose the extent and value of his worldwide assets to Hollywood film companies who allege he profited from...
04 July 2014

Belgrave Finance: R. v. Hamilton

›
While not directly involved in management of failed finance company Belgrave Finance, Hawkes Bay lawyer Hugh Edward Staples Hamilton receiv...

Maori: NZ Steel v. Butcher

›
Stalled Treaty negotiations between government and Waikato iwi are hampering operations at the Glenbrook steel mill owned by Australian lis...
03 July 2014

Real Estate: Hokitika Property Ltd . Hurt

›
An immediate paper profit of some $217,000 was at stake when a company controlled by two chartered accountants with Gilligan Rowe and Assoc...
02 July 2014

Defamation: Rafiq v. Meredith Connell

›
The legal profession is placed in a special position when it comes to defamation: anything said in court and everything said or written whe...
01 July 2014

Relationship property: Jack v. Jack

›
Having given up her own career to support her husband in his career as a medical specialist, a former nurse was awarded seventy per cent of...
27 June 2014

School Rules: Battison v. Melloy

›
Adolescence is a time for asserting independence and for testing boundaries. In a High Court challenge to rules governing hair length at St...
24 June 2014

Greymouth Petroleum: Sturgess v. Dunphy

›
The Court of Appeal has set parameters for warring parties within dysfunctional Greymouth Petroleum to negotiate the sale of a 13.8 per cen...
16 June 2014

Partnership: Kidd v. Worldwide Leisure

›
A legal spat between two overseas millionaires over ownership of Huka Lodge has returned to the New Zealand courts. Once they were friend...
10 June 2014

Leaky Homes: Osborne v. Auckland City

›
Despite a last-ditch offer of an out of court settlement by Auckland City nervous that the Supreme Court would rule against it in a leaky h...
28 May 2014

Rates: Mangawai Ratepayers v. Kaipara District

›
Mangawhai ratepayers got sympathy but not much more in their High Court challenge to cost blowouts exceeding $20 million on their local sew...
20 May 2014

Mainzeal: Yan v. Mainzeal Ltd

›
Insolvency practitioners chasing down funds for creditors of the Mainzeal Group are having their difficulties pinning down Richard Yan, the...
16 May 2014

Belgrave Finance: R. v. Hamilton

›
Hugh Edward Staples Hamilton, lawyer and former mayor of Central Hawkes Bay, has been convicted of being party to theft by a person in a sp...
12 May 2014

Hanover Finance: Hotchin v. KA No.4 Trust

›
The FMA acted properly and in the public interest when intervening in legal arguments over how much Hanover Finance director Mark Hotchin c...
07 May 2014

Lombard Finance: Graham et al v. R

›
Home detention imposed by the Court of Appeal on former directors of Lombard Finance has been set aside by the Supreme Court.  Sentences of...
02 May 2014

Historic places: Lambton Quay Properties v. Wellington City

›
It is easy to spend money when it is other people’s money: a maxim exemplified by the Historic Places Trust claiming domain over earthquake...
30 April 2014

Vexatious litigant: Attorney-General v. Siemer

›
The High Court has declared Vincent Ross Siemer a vexatious litigant.  Without first getting court approval, he is barred from taking legal...
09 April 2014

Feltex: Credit Suisse v. Houghton

›
Lack of rules governing class actions has left Feltex shareholders wandering through a maze as they attempt to recover compensation for all...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Mike Ross
Mike Ross spent nearly thirty years teaching all aspects of commercial law to business students and almost as many years writing variously for The New Zealand Herald, The National Business Review and The Chartered Accountants' Journal. He authored two books on legal principles governing business reconstructions. Mike Ross holds degrees in both law and economics from the University of Auckland.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.