Mike Ross Law Blog
Legal issues: Inside out
29 August 2014
Maori: Paki v. Attorney-General
›
Recognising that its ruling might open future political claims by Maori for resource rents on water used to generate hydroelectric power, t...
27 August 2014
Insurance: Ridgecrest v. IAG
›
Policy wording enabled a Christchurch building owner with an underinsured property recover more than the amount nominally insured because a...
Fair Trading: Godfrey Hirst (NZ) v. Cavalier Bremworth
›
The dominant headline message in any advertisement must not be misleading the Court of Appeal ruled. It is a breach of the Fair Trading Ac...
11 August 2014
Joint Venture: Worldwide v. NZ Venue & Event Management
›
After gaining total management control in 2006 of the 12,000 seat Vector Arena in Auckland, the Australian-based Jacobsen family has cheerf...
30 July 2014
Asset freeze: Twentieth Century Fox v. Dotcom
›
Kim Dotcom has been forced to disclose the extent and value of his worldwide assets to Hollywood film companies who allege he profited from...
04 July 2014
Belgrave Finance: R. v. Hamilton
›
While not directly involved in management of failed finance company Belgrave Finance, Hawkes Bay lawyer Hugh Edward Staples Hamilton receiv...
Maori: NZ Steel v. Butcher
›
Stalled Treaty negotiations between government and Waikato iwi are hampering operations at the Glenbrook steel mill owned by Australian lis...
03 July 2014
Real Estate: Hokitika Property Ltd . Hurt
›
An immediate paper profit of some $217,000 was at stake when a company controlled by two chartered accountants with Gilligan Rowe and Assoc...
02 July 2014
Defamation: Rafiq v. Meredith Connell
›
The legal profession is placed in a special position when it comes to defamation: anything said in court and everything said or written whe...
01 July 2014
Relationship property: Jack v. Jack
›
Having given up her own career to support her husband in his career as a medical specialist, a former nurse was awarded seventy per cent of...
27 June 2014
School Rules: Battison v. Melloy
›
Adolescence is a time for asserting independence and for testing boundaries. In a High Court challenge to rules governing hair length at St...
24 June 2014
Greymouth Petroleum: Sturgess v. Dunphy
›
The Court of Appeal has set parameters for warring parties within dysfunctional Greymouth Petroleum to negotiate the sale of a 13.8 per cen...
16 June 2014
Partnership: Kidd v. Worldwide Leisure
›
A legal spat between two overseas millionaires over ownership of Huka Lodge has returned to the New Zealand courts. Once they were friend...
10 June 2014
Leaky Homes: Osborne v. Auckland City
›
Despite a last-ditch offer of an out of court settlement by Auckland City nervous that the Supreme Court would rule against it in a leaky h...
28 May 2014
Rates: Mangawai Ratepayers v. Kaipara District
›
Mangawhai ratepayers got sympathy but not much more in their High Court challenge to cost blowouts exceeding $20 million on their local sew...
20 May 2014
Mainzeal: Yan v. Mainzeal Ltd
›
Insolvency practitioners chasing down funds for creditors of the Mainzeal Group are having their difficulties pinning down Richard Yan, the...
16 May 2014
Belgrave Finance: R. v. Hamilton
›
Hugh Edward Staples Hamilton, lawyer and former mayor of Central Hawkes Bay, has been convicted of being party to theft by a person in a sp...
12 May 2014
Hanover Finance: Hotchin v. KA No.4 Trust
›
The FMA acted properly and in the public interest when intervening in legal arguments over how much Hanover Finance director Mark Hotchin c...
07 May 2014
Lombard Finance: Graham et al v. R
›
Home detention imposed by the Court of Appeal on former directors of Lombard Finance has been set aside by the Supreme Court. Sentences of...
02 May 2014
Historic places: Lambton Quay Properties v. Wellington City
›
It is easy to spend money when it is other people’s money: a maxim exemplified by the Historic Places Trust claiming domain over earthquake...
30 April 2014
Vexatious litigant: Attorney-General v. Siemer
›
The High Court has declared Vincent Ross Siemer a vexatious litigant. Without first getting court approval, he is barred from taking legal...
09 April 2014
Feltex: Credit Suisse v. Houghton
›
Lack of rules governing class actions has left Feltex shareholders wandering through a maze as they attempt to recover compensation for all...
‹
›
Home
View web version