Mike Ross Law Blog

Legal issues: Inside out

28 March 2019

Legal Advice: Johnson v. Canterbury/Westland Standards Cttee

›
Lawyer Ronald Bruce Johnson was suspended from practice for three months after failing to give full advice to ill-informed trustees of a Sa...
27 March 2019

Fraud: R. v. Bublitz, McKay & Blackwood

›
Convicted of fraud after milking government guarantees put in place after the 2008 global financial crisis: Paul Bublitz was sentenced to t...

Forestry Rights: OHL Ltd v. Peria Charitable Trust

›
Owning forestry land near Kaitaia, Maori-owned Peria Charitable Trust is accused of selling the same cutting rights twice over.  A Mark Hot...
26 March 2019

Fraud: Acacia Motorhomes Ltd v. Lyn Doc Com Ltd

›
Facing a seven million dollar penalty for GST and unpaid duty following a customs fraud, Auckland-based vehicle importer Acacia Motorhomes ...
25 March 2019

Leaky Homes: Roberts v. Jules Consultancy Ltd

›
Property manager Jules Consultancy Ltd breached the Fair Trading Act when failing to make full disclosure to potential purchaser Michael Ro...

Family Arrangement: Huljich v. Huljich

›
As loving sons, Huljich brothers drew on the $80 million generated from their 1995 sale of Best Corporation to support mother Elizabeth.  H...
21 March 2019

Overseas Investment: Land Information v. Agria

›
First legal action for breach of Overseas Investment Act ‘good character’ rules saw the High Court approve negotiated penalties of $100,000...

Conversion: Superthriiler Jet Sprint v. Coggan

›
Mark Coggan, joint owner of Superthriller Jet Sprint operating out of Manukau in south Auckland, has been ordered to hand over all Superthr...

Capital + Merchant: Gibson v. Official Assignee

›
Insolvency Service has to bear the cost of a potential $2.41 million GST lability arising from its $18.5 million settlement with auditors o...
19 March 2019

Fair Trading: Ballance Agri-Nutrients v. Quin Environmentals

›
Quin Environmentals breached the Fair Trading Act by linking its superphosphate fertiiser to Fertmark accreditation when it did not comply ...

Relationship Property: Oldfield v. Oldfield

›
With trustees of Oldfield Family Trust estranged and deadlocked, the High Court removed husband and wife appointing New Zealand Guardian Tr...
15 March 2019

Insolvency: re Sandford

›
With unsecured debts of $566,800 and declared assets of only $3000, John David Sandford’s part-payment Insolvency Act proposal was refused ...

Intellectual Property: Solar Bright v. Martin

›
Established to commercialise ice-warning devices for roads, Christchurch-based Solar Bright recovered company assets from founders Patrick ...
13 March 2019

BlackfortFX: Graham v. Tyler

›
To date, the nearly one thousand investors snared in BlackfortFX’s Ponzi fraud have got back thirty cents in the dollar. The High Court has...

Defamation: Cato v. Manaia Media

›
Lawyer Kristin Cato alleges  Horse & Pony  magazine defamed her in published comments subsequent to a private mediated settlement which...
12 March 2019

Tax Avoidance: Cullen Group v. Inland Revenue

›
Eric Watson’s Cullen group use of tax provisions intended for genuine overseas third party lenders amounted to tax avoidance the High Court...
11 March 2019

Mortgage: Haines v. Memelink

›
On home detention, Otaki lawyer Quentin Haines gained a High Court injunction blocking a forced sale of his property by Harry Memelink seek...
08 March 2019

Reckless Trading: Cooper v. Debut Homes Ltd

›
Decisions by the director of an insolvent property company to box on and complete houses under construction to sell for a better price were...
01 March 2019

Estate: Monk v. Burgess

›
Legal fees on all sides totalled over four million dollars.  Of that, fees totalling $1.26 million incurred by estate executors defending u...
26 February 2019

Richard Yan: Mainzeal Property v. King Facade

›
Plans by Mainzeal’s Richard Yan for a hotel and vineyard on Waiheke Island hosting Chinese Communist Party officials are at standstill.  Is...

Reckless Trading: Mainzeal Property v. King Facade

›
Insolvent for nearly a decade from 2005 through to its collapse in 2013 leaving creditors owed some $110 million, Mainzeal was weakly capit...
22 February 2019

Gold Line Taxis: Deep v. Auckland Gold Line Taxis Ltd

›
Details of an attempted coup by disgruntled members of Auckland’s Gold Line Co-Operative Taxi Society Ltd played out in the High Court.  In...

Liquidation: Apollo Bathroom and Kitchen v. Ling

›
Shan Ling was ordered to repay $400,000 taken from Apollo Bathroom and Kitchen to pay a personal tax bill.  Her claim the money was owed fo...
21 February 2019

Commerce Act: Commerce Commission v. First Gas

›
A classic case of the big operator screwing the small guy, seeking to reduce market competition: Commerce Commission intervention saw First...

Contract: Bei v. Wang

›
Duoyu Bei claims he is owed $1.28 million; Chao Wang claims he is owed $1.1 million.  The two businessmen are at each other’s throats with ...
20 February 2019

David Henderson: FTG Securities v. BNZ

›
Out of the wreckage of South Canterbury Finance, government sold to interests associated with failed property developer David Henderson the...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Mike Ross
Mike Ross spent nearly thirty years teaching all aspects of commercial law to business students and almost as many years writing variously for The New Zealand Herald, The National Business Review and The Chartered Accountants' Journal. He authored two books on legal principles governing business reconstructions. Mike Ross holds degrees in both law and economics from the University of Auckland.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.