Mike Ross Law Blog
Legal issues: Inside out
29 April 2020
Family Trust: Percy v. Percy
›
Beneficiaries of Percy Family Trust which is part owner of the Hawkes Bay farm where Shilo Stud breeds Santa Gertrudis cattle allege brothe...
24 April 2020
Insolvency Practitioners: Tempest Litigation v. Davies
›
Machinery is now in place to force compulsory licensing of insolvency specialists and the back biting is starting. The High Court dismissed...
20 April 2020
Business Sale: Do Yay Ltd v. Wei
›
CafĂ© Brioche formerly trading at Takapuna on Auckland’s North Shore was ordered to pay $272,500 damages for misrepresenting turnover when s...
17 April 2020
Receivership: Mann v. Scutter
›
With his Marlborough Sounds contracting business underwater and bankruptcy threatening, Gary Mann was encouraged after a neighbour bought u...
08 April 2020
Fraud: Pou v. R.
›
Two years jail was not excessive for Lulu Amberleee Pou’s second Facebook fraud conviction for selling fake tickets to live shows, the High...
25 March 2020
Construction Contracts: Poly Wealth Trustee Ltd v. van Vlerken
›
Enforcing a Construction Contracts Act payment claim stalled because the claim form omitted details required by the Act. It was irrelevant ...
Memelink: Memelink v. Collins & May Law
›
Refusing permission to appeal his bankruptcy nearly one year out of time, the Court of Appeal described Harry Memelink as a debtor whose m...
24 March 2020
Environment: Cowley v. R.
›
Angered by council resource management procedures, Peter Cowley pruned a Moreton Bay fig overhanging his daughter’s property in the New Ply...
23 March 2020
Joint Venture: Luo v. Shiu
›
Just south of Auckland City boundary, Pokeno has mushroomed in size with a frenzy of residential construction. Looking to profit, Annie Shi...
Monopoly: Commerce Commission v. Aurora Energy
›
Aurora Energy was fined $4.9 million for persistent power outages in its Otago distribution area after poor maintenance and deferred capita...
20 March 2020
Relationship Property: B. v. A
›
The Family Court overturned as ‘unfair’ a relationship property agreement giving the husband a token 0.05 per cent share of the family home...
18 March 2020
Relationship Property: Zhao v. He
›
Undocumented money transfers totalling $1.6 million benefitting Chongming Zhao were treated as relationship property by the High Court to b...
Guarantee: Primary Services New Zealand Ltd v. Fonagy
›
Property developer Andrew Fonagy was ordered to pay $850,000 on his guarantee of funding for a central Christchurch hotel project. Nervous...
13 March 2020
Motor Racing: Taupo Car Club v. TMP Ltd
›
Legacy rights for use of Taupo’s Bruce McLaren Motor Sport Park have boiled over with Taupo Car Club disputing a fifty dollar charge per ca...
Finance: Low v. Du
›
Having used a tradesman as front to finance property developments, Lenotre Low was required to compensate him when demanding an Auckland pr...
Wine Fraud: R. v. Southern Boundary Wines
›
Management of Southern Boundary Wines deliberately mislabelled wine, pressured employees to carry out the fraud and bad-mouthed the whistle...
12 March 2020
Malicious Prosecution: Burgess v. Beaven
›
Bankrupted in 2017 after over a decade of relationship property litigation, Gary Owen Burgess failed in his High Court request for approval...
11 March 2020
Fraud: Wood v. R.
›
By voluntarily blowing the whistle and quickly pleading guilty to Serious Fraud Office charges, foreign exchange trader Kelvin Clive Wood w...
10 March 2020
Family Company: Kelly v. Kelly Construction Ltd
›
William and Valerie Kelly are majority shareholders in their family company, Kelly Construction. Their two sons sued in the High Court to ...
Phoenix Company: Inland Revenue v. Clooney Restaurant Ltd
›
Clooney restaurant owner Tony Stewart was ordered to pay Inland Revenue $585,200 after setting up a ‘phoenix company’ to stay in business w...
09 March 2020
Bankruptcy: Haines v. Memelink
›
Notorious Wellington debtor Harry Memelink has been bankrupted whilst currently bankrupt. Concurrent bankruptcies are seldom seen. Mr M...
Gift: Hurlimann v. Noland
›
Early in their relationship he said he would never make a claim against her house, the matrimonial home from her previous marriage. Over f...
Ebert Construction: Shephard v. Wakefield Plant Ltd
›
With Ebert Construction unsecured creditors owed $123 million, liquidators failed in their $2.04 million claim against related company Wake...
05 March 2020
Finance: Lu v. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China
›
After defaulting on a $2.9 million residential loan, Chinese investor Qiufen Lu unsuccessfully asked the High Court to block legal action t...
Estate: Hall v. Radich-Chaytor
›
Anthony Chaytor died in 2018 aged 84 having married four years earlier a woman twelve years younger, this after a lifetime as a bachelor. ...
03 March 2020
Wendy's: re Cone Enterprises Ltd
›
After losing control of Wendy’s master franchise for New Zealand, Chang Xi is on the hook for $5.5 million. This followed Mr Xi’s failed a...
Fraud: First NZ Properties v. Barnes
›
His address on the public register is Ruby Bay, Nelson. Neil Allan Barnes is currently overseas in no hurry to return after being ordered ...
02 March 2020
Bankruptcy: Official Assignee v. McCreath
›
Bankrupt for the fourth time, Mark Anthony McCreath’s discharge from bankruptcy was extended to July 2023, banning him from involvement in ...
28 February 2020
GST: Police v. Pure
›
Goods he shoplifted were not selected on price alone, but the maximum penalty for theft varied from seven years to one year depending upon ...
Tax Evasion: R. v. Chahil & Gupta
›
Tax evasion by Masala restaurant chain included money laundering. Rupindar Singh Chahil was fined $50,000 and sentenced to three years two...
‹
›
Home
View web version