Mike Ross Law Blog

Legal issues: Inside out

30 August 2022

Director Disqualification: Registrar of Companies v. Bublitz & McKay

›
Paul Bublitz’ and Bruce McKay’s current disqualifications from acting as company directors were extended to 2026 by the High Court.  Compani...
29 August 2022

Business Valuation: Green v. Gillette

›
Nelson business owner Thomas Green had difficulty convincing the Court of Appeal that his company now known as Roofpower Installations Ltd w...
25 August 2022

Land Subdivision: Ryan v. M & E Ryan & Sons Ltd

›
Valuable family vineyards now claimed to be worth some $70 million at Seddon carefully set up in 2009 to avoid any tax liability on subdivis...
24 August 2022

Ormiston Rise: Jackson v. Grant

›
With unsecured creditors of Auckland’s failed Ormiston Rise development currently claiming $20.9 million, liquidator Damian Grant questions ...

Undue Influence: re estate of Vilmos Gaitz

›
Vilmos Gaitz arrived in New Zealand as a teenager fleeing the abortive 1956 Hungarian uprising against Russian domination.  On his death in ...
23 August 2022

Joint Venture: Carrington Resort v. van den Brink

›
Theo van den Brink walked away from a proposed joint venture with Shanghai-based interests who control Carrington Resort at Northland’s Mata...
22 August 2022

Property Sale: Mao v. Singh

›
  Xieyan Mao sold an Auckland property ripe for redevelopment supposedly free of any tenancy then argued it was the purchaser’s problem to r...
19 August 2022

Will: re Meyer

›
Instructions to be acted on after death entered on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet were validated as a will by the High Court. The Wills Act p...
17 August 2022

Passing Off: Pure Dew Water v. Pantranz

›
Auckland water bottler Pure Dew claims distributors Kyle and Selina Paniora have stolen Pure Dew customers and have been selling their own r...
15 August 2022

Gulf Harbour: Inert Holdings v. Gulf Harbour Marine Village

›
It was a lawyers’ delight: the original developer of Gulf Harbour subdivision on Auckland’s Whangaparoa Peninsular was wound up at a loss; i...

Construction: Davies v. K M Smith Builder Ltd

›
Having a letter from builder of their high-end Queenstown home to get release of bank funding did not give owners Simon and Judith Davies gr...
12 August 2022

Joint Venture: Elon Ltd v. Agrotrust Ltd

›
Mount Maunganui-based Jorge Arizaga and Coromandel supplier Erion Figueiredo are disputing whether a joint venture exists in their argument ...

Family Dealings: Abchal Investments v. Saini

›
In 2019, Parminder Bawa purchased an Oamaru dairy from the wife of Aman Saini.  Aman’s brother Akashdeep Saini paid Bawa $35,000, part of a ...
11 August 2022

Asset Forfeiture: Commissioner of Police v. Shakib

›
Convicted in 2017 of customs fraud, Amar Raouf Shakib’s assets including an Auckland property with net equity of some $1.2 million have been...
10 August 2022

Family Trust: re M & R Cooper No. 2 Trust

›
For Jane Austen devotees, it has the making of a thousand page novel; a moving story of a blended family, inheritances and a multi-million d...
09 August 2022

Family Mortgage: Able Ventures Ltd v. Bolton

›
Allegations of fraud and loss of family money lent on mortgage featured in what Justice Duffy called a unique case. Members of the Bolton fa...
08 August 2022

Company Deadlock: re Kiwi Sheds Northland Ltd

›
Northland construction business Kiwi Sheds Northland Ltd is being wound down under court supervision after directors Robert Gauld and Deane ...

Beer Spot: The Beer Spot Ltd v. Payn

›
Jason Payne and Laurence van Dam, co-founders of Auckland’s Beer Spot, fell out and Payne is entitled to immediate payment of $171,500 lent ...
05 August 2022

Money Laundering: R. v. Wilson

›
Spending money generated by her then partner’s drug dealing resulted in Joanne Lisa Marie Wilson’s conviction for money laundering.  Sentenc...
04 August 2022

Construction: Dalton v. Mico Development

›
Paying subcontractors direct at a time when the head contractor was having cashflow difficulties had a cost for Tony Gapes Mico Development ...

Real Estate Commission: Soft Technology v. Jones Lang

›
Behind the banal puffery of Auckland Council-controlled ATEED promoting its 2017 lease of film studios in west Auckland lay a dispute over f...
29 July 2022

Copyright: Burden v. ESR Group

›
Ten years on from Customs seizure of imported furniture, Early Settler was ordered to pay $221,000 after selling product held to be in breac...

Harassment: Hooper v. Gee

›
Social media is awash with intemperate language, but that alone does not amount to harassment under the Harmful Digital Communications Act. ...
26 July 2022

Construction: Melbourne Ltd v. Bartlett Concrete

›
Construction Contracts Act ‘pay now, argue later’ rules are designed to protect contractors’ cash flow.  Arguing first and delaying payment ...

Share Valuation: Williamson v. Smalley

›
Christchurch investment adviser Hamilton Hindin Greene alleges former director James Small is stringing out legal action over a disputed $2....
22 July 2022

Website: re Olsen

›
If catfishing on dating sites is not sufficiently rewarding, scammers are now catfishing clients of professional service firms.  Auckland la...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Mike Ross
Mike Ross spent nearly thirty years teaching all aspects of commercial law to business students and almost as many years writing variously for The New Zealand Herald, The National Business Review and The Chartered Accountants' Journal. He authored two books on legal principles governing business reconstructions. Mike Ross holds degrees in both law and economics from the University of Auckland.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.