Mike Ross Law Blog
Legal issues: Inside out
30 September 2022
Building Consents: Nuwave Software v. Objective Corporation
›
The boys from Sydney sneaked into New Zealand under cover of darkness, incurring a $1.54 million Commerce Act fine, planning to seize contro...
23 September 2022
Tax Fraud: Sami v. Inland Revenue
›
The High Court refused Rajesh Sami leave to appeal his 2017 conviction for tax fraud; his last ditch effort to avoid deportation to Fiji. Sa...
22 September 2022
Leasehold: KOL Holdings v. Xu
›
Owners of twenty-one leasehold apartments on Auckland’s Remuera Road have had their leases cancelled following a rent strike when annual ren...
21 September 2022
Legal Costs: Criffel Deer Ltd v. ANZ Bank
›
Facing allegations of fraud from Wellington lawyer and entrepreneur Mike Garnham and his Garnham group of companies, ANZ Bank spent some $25...
Leasehold: Smith v. Paros Property Trust
›
Auckland commercial landlord Neil Christian thought he was dealing with just one pesky leaseholder running a hopeless legal argument about l...
20 September 2022
De facto director: NZ Causeway International v. Wang
›
Whilst living back in China, Jie Cao left fellow shareholder Yi Wang in sole charge of their Auckland health food store. Ms Wang was ordere...
Stonewood: Boult & Merrick v. Cain
›
Creditors can be told details of a $3.5 million confidential settlement between liquidator of Stonewood Homes and directors James Boult and ...
16 September 2022
Construction: United Builders v. MKOD Developments
›
It seemed like a good idea at the time; have an acquaintance hold deposits as a stakeholder for later onward payment to a builder. Now both...
Lease: Tobem Holdings v. Kid Country Holdings
›
Sued for more than one million dollars in a dispute over lease of commercial space intended for use as a childcare facility, tenant Kid Coun...
Land: CSR Pokeno Ltd v. Yes Investments
›
It was a game of high stakes poker. Interests associated with Annie Shui and her much litigated attempts to develop a residential subdivisio...
14 September 2022
Class Action: Body Corporate 91535 v. 3A Composites GmbH
›
German manufacturer of aluminium cladding alleged to be high fire risk fended off litigation funders saying there was no ‘commonality of int...
Fraud: Pome'e v. Inland Revenue
›
Confirming Sione Na’aniumotu Pome’e 27 months’ imprisonment for a $1.8 million tax fraud, the High Court said this sentence was generous giv...
07 September 2022
Fraud: Vuniduvu v. R.
›
Litia Rokele Vuniduvu’s conviction for fraud after stealing over $360,000 from Ports of Auckland in a false invoicing scam was upheld by the...
06 September 2022
Fraud: Rosebud Corporate v. Bublitz & Cook
›
Judges frequently chide litigants for failure to follow the rules. You might expect the High Court to be a paragon of virtue when it comes ...
05 September 2022
Discovery: Andrews v. Lomax
›
Described by Judge Lester as an attempted ‘gotcha’ moment in highly charged pre-trial challenges to document discovery, Arrowtown hoteliers ...
02 September 2022
Joint Venture: Matvin Group v. Crown Finance
›
Chris Arbuckle’s Crown Finance Ltd was ordered to compensate Matvin Group after unilaterally taking over a joint property development at Auc...
01 September 2022
Relationship Property: Capper v. Dallinger
›
It came as a surprise to Steven Dallinger when accountants holding a High Court order told him they were now in charge of Murupara farming d...
30 August 2022
Director Disqualification: Registrar of Companies v. Bublitz & McKay
›
Paul Bublitz’ and Bruce McKay’s current disqualifications from acting as company directors were extended to 2026 by the High Court. Compani...
29 August 2022
Business Valuation: Green v. Gillette
›
Nelson business owner Thomas Green had difficulty convincing the Court of Appeal that his company now known as Roofpower Installations Ltd w...
25 August 2022
Land Subdivision: Ryan v. M & E Ryan & Sons Ltd
›
Valuable family vineyards now claimed to be worth some $70 million at Seddon carefully set up in 2009 to avoid any tax liability on subdivis...
24 August 2022
Ormiston Rise: Jackson v. Grant
›
With unsecured creditors of Auckland’s failed Ormiston Rise development currently claiming $20.9 million, liquidator Damian Grant questions ...
Undue Influence: re estate of Vilmos Gaitz
›
Vilmos Gaitz arrived in New Zealand as a teenager fleeing the abortive 1956 Hungarian uprising against Russian domination. On his death in ...
23 August 2022
Joint Venture: Carrington Resort v. van den Brink
›
Theo van den Brink walked away from a proposed joint venture with Shanghai-based interests who control Carrington Resort at Northland’s Mata...
22 August 2022
Property Sale: Mao v. Singh
›
Xieyan Mao sold an Auckland property ripe for redevelopment supposedly free of any tenancy then argued it was the purchaser’s problem to r...
19 August 2022
Will: re Meyer
›
Instructions to be acted on after death entered on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet were validated as a will by the High Court. The Wills Act p...
17 August 2022
Passing Off: Pure Dew Water v. Pantranz
›
Auckland water bottler Pure Dew claims distributors Kyle and Selina Paniora have stolen Pure Dew customers and have been selling their own r...
15 August 2022
Gulf Harbour: Inert Holdings v. Gulf Harbour Marine Village
›
It was a lawyers’ delight: the original developer of Gulf Harbour subdivision on Auckland’s Whangaparoa Peninsular was wound up at a loss; i...
‹
›
Home
View web version