Mike Ross Law Blog

Legal issues: Inside out

30 September 2022

Building Consents: Nuwave Software v. Objective Corporation

›
The boys from Sydney sneaked into New Zealand under cover of darkness, incurring a $1.54 million Commerce Act fine, planning to seize contro...
23 September 2022

Tax Fraud: Sami v. Inland Revenue

›
The High Court refused Rajesh Sami leave to appeal his 2017 conviction for tax fraud; his last ditch effort to avoid deportation to Fiji. Sa...
22 September 2022

Leasehold: KOL Holdings v. Xu

›
Owners of twenty-one leasehold apartments on Auckland’s Remuera Road have had their leases cancelled following a rent strike when annual ren...
21 September 2022

Legal Costs: Criffel Deer Ltd v. ANZ Bank

›
Facing allegations of fraud from Wellington lawyer and entrepreneur Mike Garnham and his Garnham group of companies, ANZ Bank spent some $25...

Leasehold: Smith v. Paros Property Trust

›
Auckland commercial landlord Neil Christian thought he was dealing with just one pesky leaseholder running a hopeless legal argument about l...
20 September 2022

De facto director: NZ Causeway International v. Wang

›
Whilst living back in China, Jie Cao left fellow shareholder Yi Wang in sole charge of their Auckland health food store.  Ms Wang was ordere...

Stonewood: Boult & Merrick v. Cain

›
Creditors can be told details of a $3.5 million confidential settlement between liquidator of Stonewood Homes and directors James Boult and ...
16 September 2022

Construction: United Builders v. MKOD Developments

›
It seemed like a good idea at the time; have an acquaintance hold deposits as a stakeholder for later onward payment to a builder.  Now both...

Lease: Tobem Holdings v. Kid Country Holdings

›
Sued for more than one million dollars in a dispute over lease of commercial space intended for use as a childcare facility, tenant Kid Coun...

Land: CSR Pokeno Ltd v. Yes Investments

›
It was a game of high stakes poker. Interests associated with Annie Shui and her much litigated attempts to develop a residential subdivisio...
14 September 2022

Class Action: Body Corporate 91535 v. 3A Composites GmbH

›
German manufacturer of aluminium cladding alleged to be high fire risk fended off litigation funders saying there was no ‘commonality of int...

Fraud: Pome'e v. Inland Revenue

›
Confirming Sione Na’aniumotu Pome’e 27 months’ imprisonment for a $1.8 million tax fraud, the High Court said this sentence was generous giv...
07 September 2022

Fraud: Vuniduvu v. R.

›
Litia Rokele Vuniduvu’s conviction for fraud after stealing over $360,000 from Ports of Auckland in a false invoicing scam was upheld by the...
06 September 2022

Fraud: Rosebud Corporate v. Bublitz & Cook

›
Judges frequently chide litigants for failure to follow the rules.  You might expect the High Court to be a paragon of virtue when it comes ...
05 September 2022

Discovery: Andrews v. Lomax

›
Described by Judge Lester as an attempted ‘gotcha’ moment in highly charged pre-trial challenges to document discovery, Arrowtown hoteliers ...
02 September 2022

Joint Venture: Matvin Group v. Crown Finance

›
Chris Arbuckle’s Crown Finance Ltd was ordered to compensate Matvin Group after unilaterally taking over a joint property development at Auc...
01 September 2022

Relationship Property: Capper v. Dallinger

›
It came as a surprise to Steven Dallinger when accountants holding a High Court order told him they were now in charge of Murupara farming d...
30 August 2022

Director Disqualification: Registrar of Companies v. Bublitz & McKay

›
Paul Bublitz’ and Bruce McKay’s current disqualifications from acting as company directors were extended to 2026 by the High Court.  Compani...
29 August 2022

Business Valuation: Green v. Gillette

›
Nelson business owner Thomas Green had difficulty convincing the Court of Appeal that his company now known as Roofpower Installations Ltd w...
25 August 2022

Land Subdivision: Ryan v. M & E Ryan & Sons Ltd

›
Valuable family vineyards now claimed to be worth some $70 million at Seddon carefully set up in 2009 to avoid any tax liability on subdivis...
24 August 2022

Ormiston Rise: Jackson v. Grant

›
With unsecured creditors of Auckland’s failed Ormiston Rise development currently claiming $20.9 million, liquidator Damian Grant questions ...

Undue Influence: re estate of Vilmos Gaitz

›
Vilmos Gaitz arrived in New Zealand as a teenager fleeing the abortive 1956 Hungarian uprising against Russian domination.  On his death in ...
23 August 2022

Joint Venture: Carrington Resort v. van den Brink

›
Theo van den Brink walked away from a proposed joint venture with Shanghai-based interests who control Carrington Resort at Northland’s Mata...
22 August 2022

Property Sale: Mao v. Singh

›
  Xieyan Mao sold an Auckland property ripe for redevelopment supposedly free of any tenancy then argued it was the purchaser’s problem to r...
19 August 2022

Will: re Meyer

›
Instructions to be acted on after death entered on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet were validated as a will by the High Court. The Wills Act p...
17 August 2022

Passing Off: Pure Dew Water v. Pantranz

›
Auckland water bottler Pure Dew claims distributors Kyle and Selina Paniora have stolen Pure Dew customers and have been selling their own r...
15 August 2022

Gulf Harbour: Inert Holdings v. Gulf Harbour Marine Village

›
It was a lawyers’ delight: the original developer of Gulf Harbour subdivision on Auckland’s Whangaparoa Peninsular was wound up at a loss; i...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Mike Ross
Mike Ross spent nearly thirty years teaching all aspects of commercial law to business students and almost as many years writing variously for The New Zealand Herald, The National Business Review and The Chartered Accountants' Journal. He authored two books on legal principles governing business reconstructions. Mike Ross holds degrees in both law and economics from the University of Auckland.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.