23 June 2015

Insurance: AAI Ltd v. 92 Lichfield St

Receivers of a company associated with bankrupt property developer David Henderson forced a Vero subsidiary to pay out $6.5 million, part of promised compensation for insured earthquake damage, by using court winding up procedures.
The High Court was told Vero subsidiary AAI Ltd was negotiating in 2013 with receivers Grant Thornton over payment for earthquake damage to property owned by a Christchurch company in receivership: 92 Lichfield Street Ltd.  A business interruption claim of $675,000 had already been settled.  There were difficulties in agreeing the amount due for property damage.  Evidence was given that Vero made a revised settlement offer in June 2013 of $6.5 million plus claim costs to date together with some $203,000 for protection measures incurred.  Several extensions for acceptance of the offer were granted.  Grant Thornton accepted on the final date before the offer closed against a background of Vero threatening to make a lesser payment of some $4.6 million and closing the file.
Grant Thornton refused to sign off on a seven page release form demanded by Vero which required the receivers to get all the company’s secured creditors agreement to the deal before Vero would pay out.  The receivers issued a Companies Act statutory demand against the Vero subsidiary to force payment.  Associate Judge Osborne ordered payment of $6.5 million within fifteen working days or steps to put AAI Ltd into liquidation would follow.  Judge Osborne ruled the unequivocal June 2013 offer to pay $6.5 million had been accepted, payment was due and Vero could not later introduce new terms into the settlement agreement requiring creditors’ consent.
AAI Ltd v. 92 Lichfield Street Ltd – High Court (23.06.15)

15.071