21 July 2015

Fraud: Helsby-Knight v. R.

Serial fraudster Michael Helsby-Knight was sentenced to three years and one month jail by the Court of Appeal for his part in three overlapping scams in which just over 110 victims were duped of $156,790.
His conviction followed three separate frauds perpetrated over a twelve month period ending mid-2012: the Canton Trade Fair Scheme; the Mike Caughey Trading Scheme; and the Foxconn Traders Scheme.  After his arrest, Helsby-Wright was refused bail and spent eighteen months in custody before trial because of his long record of fraud-related offending stretching back to 1985.
The court was told the Canton Trade Fair Scheme involved Helsby-Knight, using the name Michael Caughey, claiming to be the authorised agent for a trade fair being held in Guangzhou and Canton in 2011-2012.  There was in fact a trade fair being held at that time.  In a mass email to Auckland businesses he offered free travel and accommodation to the trade fair as part of an official trade delegation with interested parties required to pay a $125 registration fee.  Those registering received a package, purportedly couriered from China, containing Cathay Pacific ticket vouchers and accommodation vouchers for China.  The documentation was false.  Helsby-Knight collected about $5600 with this fraud.
In the Mike Caughey Trading Scheme, Helsby-Knight claimed to act for a Hong Kong registered company importing discounted electronic goods.  Customers were required to pay a fifty per cent deposit on ordering with the balance due on delivery.  No goods were delivered.  Customers complaining were told goods had been held up at Customs.  A total of $129,000 was collected in this scam.
The Foxconn Traders Scheme got underway with Helsby-Knight changing his name by deed poll to “Foxconn Group plc”.  He then obtained a passport in this corporate name, opened a ANZ bank account as Foxconn Group plc and set up an associated website.  Glossy brochures were printed offering for sale discounted high-end electronic goods.  Either full payment or a substantial deposit was required with each order.  Goods did not arrive.  Customers of Foxconn lost some $22,000. 
Helsby-Knight v. R. – Court of Appeal (21.07.15)

15.082