26 May 2016

Bankruptcy: Inland Revenue v. Tait-Jamieson

With debts in excess of $7.5 million, Peter John Tait-Jamieson was bankrupted after the High Court cancelled a 2012 court-approved debt restructuring scheme because of his failure to make promised payments.
Saved from immediate bankruptcy four years previously by telling creditors he was taking legal action against Broadlands Finance Ltd for allegedly unpaid director’s fees, Mr Tait-Jamieson promised to make quarterly payments to creditors in part reduction of money due.  The High Court was told promised quarterly payments were made on time for the first year, paid late in the second year and that no payments at all had been made in the last two years.
Inland Revenue, owed some $32,600 for unpaid taxes incurred prior to 2012, applied to have the scheme cancelled and Mr Tait-Jamieson bankrupted.
Associate judge Christiansen cancelled the scheme.  Only half the promised instalment payments had been made, some of them late, and no progress had been made on the alleged claim against Broadlands Finance, he said.  The scheme was cancelled over Mr Tait-Jamieson’s objections that he should first be allowed to give his side of the story to creditors.  A creditors’ meeting in August 2015 voted to cancel the scheme, but Mr Tait-Jamieson and a number of creditors received no notice of the meeting having changed adresses.
Inland Revenue v. Tait-Jamieson – High Court (26.05.16)

16.089