29 May 2017

Contract: Air NZ v. Newfoundworld

Air NZ sued to recover $1.4 million overpaid to Novotel Citygate Hotel in Hong Kong for crew accommodation over two years from 2013.  Extra charges for early check-in were wrongly billed.
Airlines drive a hard bargain when negotiating accommodation for crew on layover.  The High Court was told Air New Zealand shopped its accommodation needs around sixteen Hong Kong hotels in 2013 when an existing Novotel contract came up for renegotiation.  Novotel was signalling a large jump in room rates.  Occupancy in the 413 room Novotel Citygate was running at 92 to 94 per cent.  During an earlier two-year Novotel contract, Air NZ had required between 20 and 30 rooms a night.  It was flying Auckland/Hong Kong/London.  Early check-ins were generally accommodated by having crew “hot-bed”; they moved straight into a room vacated by another Air NZ crewmember.  It hot-bedding was not possible, Air NZ paid extra for holding a room for any early check-in.  After detailed negotiations through 2013, Novotel won the contract for a further two years.  Only after that contract ended did Air NZ raise the issue of extra charges paid for early check-ins.
The High Court ruled the 2013 Novotel contract was a new contract on new terms.  It was not a renewal of the earlier contract.  The 2013 contract contained new terms such as an obligation on Novotel to report any inappropriate behaviour by crew to Air NZ and a prohibition on Novotel disclosing room rates to crew.  The 2013 contract was silent on the question of early check-in charges.  Changed flight schedules and cancellation of the Hong Kong/London route meant hot-bedding was not possible.  Justice Wylie said Air NZ was careless in not properly checking Novotel invoices prior to payment, but Novotel had no contractual right to payments for early-check-in.  It was ordered to refund $HK7.6 million. 
Air NZ v. Newfoundworld – High Court (29.05.17)

17.057