20 February 2018

Securities: Sanders v. Project Management

Disappointed purchasers in Nelson’s Monaco Village tourist development do not get their money back the Court of Appeal ruled.  No prospectus was required.  Being issued with Land Transfer Act titles meant they were buying an interest in land and securities legislation was not relevant.
Forecast financial returns were never achieved.  Evidence was given that Nelson’s loss of the World of Wearable Art festival, increases in new tourist accommodation and a downturn in tourism immediately after the 2008 global financial crisis all affected revenue.  A group of Monaco investors sued, alleging they had signed up for ‘participatory securities’ which first required a prospectus.  They had signed up on various dates through 2006 and 2008.  The lack of a prospectus meant they were entitled to their money back, they claimed.  Securities legislation holds directors personally liable to repay funds raised without a prospectus when one is required.
Monaco investors who purchased individual accommodation units in the development signed over management rights to Monaco Management Ltd.  Monaco Management promised to allocate short-term guests across all units ‘on a fair and equitable basis’.  The Court of Appeal said individual investors are entitled only to the net revenue derived from their accommodation unit.  They have no right to share in income from other units.  Resort income is not pooled.  There was no investment in the business.  The investment was not a ‘participatory security’.  Revenue from a particular unit varied according to size, location and guest preference.  There was a 58 per cent variance in net income between the majority of unit holders demanding a refund.
The Court of Appeal further ruled that by receiving title for individual units each investor was purchasing an interest in land, not an investment security.  Being required to then lease the unit to Monaco Management for thirty years did not convert this purchase into a security requiring a prospectus.
Sanders v. Project Management Agreement & Associates – Court of Appeal (20.02.18)

18.040