The High Court ordered mother-in-law of Lower Hutt mayor Campbell Barry vacate a jointly-owned family property at Wainuiomata and be paid out her share at a valuation yet to be fixed. Interminable family wranglings compounded by her marriage break-up led Justic Grau to rule a Property Law Act buy-out was the only solution.
The High Court was told of mother-in-law Debra Harris’ involvement in public denouncements of her son-in-law with what proved to be unfounded allegations against the mayor of fraud, corruption, unlawful building work and mistreatment of animals – much of it published on social media and some of it actively promoted by his political rivals.
Mr Barry elected not to stand for re-election in the 2025 local body elections.
Evidence was given of a five hectare Wainuiomata property purchase by the Barry and Harris families in 2019, jointly purchased by Campbell Barry and spouse Laura; plus John Harris and spouse Debra – Laura’s mother.
One dwelling was on site. A second stand-alone ‘off-grid’ dwelling was built subsequently, for John and Debra.
John separated from Debra in 2022. He is now living and working overseas.
The High Court was told of family relationships between the Barrys and Debra Harris breaking down completely.
At heart, she complained the Barrys had not paid their fair share of joint costs in purchasing the property and building the second dwelling. Evidence to the contrary was dismissed.
Debra’s beliefs are intractable, even when they are demonstrably mistaken, Justice Grau said.
Having Debra remain co-owner of the five hectare property caused ongoing commercial problems for the Barrys. They could not borrow against security of the property without her consent.
Seeking to finance establishment of her law practice, daughter Laura was forced to borrow at higher rates from a third-tier lender because no mortgage security could be offered.
Sharing a driveway raised potential for further conflict.
With no end in sight for ongoing conflict, Justice Grau ordered Debra’s share be bought out and that she leave the property.
One complication is an ongoing relationship property dispute between Debra and estranged husband, John.
Justice Grau asked the warring sides to agree whether the Harris’ half share should be bought out by the Barrys, or Debra Harris’ quarter share be bought out by the remaining three co-owners: John Harris and the Barrys.
The property was valued in early 2024 at $1.62 million.
Justice Grau asked if either side wanted an updated valuation.
The court was told Debra had previously agreed to sell her quarter share to John at the 2024 valuation, but backed out two days later, claiming possible Council rezoning could see the property increase in value.
Barry v. Harris – High Court (19.08.25)
25.182