22 March 2016

Company: Meditrade Ltd v. Alcarin Ltd

Once friends, Milen Ganchev fell out with Anastas Markov alleging mispricing of specialty foods imported from Bulgaria.  A power of attorney issued in Cyprus concerning a Seychelles registered company was used in an attempt to wind up Mr Ganchev’s New Zealand company.
Mr Ganchev owns Meditrade Ltd, importer of European foodstuffs.  The European end of its supply chain is Alcarin Ltd, jointly owned by Mr Markov and Mr Ganchev.  The two dispute what mark-up Alcarin could charge.  Mr Ganchev alleges Alcarin was to supply product at cost, but in fact was adding margins of between 50 and 100 per cent.  Mr Markov denies product was to be supplied at cost only.
Their dispute surfaced in New Zealand courts with a winding up demand issued by Alcarin against Mr Ganchev’s Meditrade Ltd alleging a debt due, but unpaid.  This is a legal precursor to threatened winding up proceedings.  Evidence was given that Alcarin is registered in the Seychelle Islands but its sole director is Cypriot lawyer, Martha Spyrides.  She took a hands-off approach to company operations.  She gave a power of attorney to each of Mr Markov and Mr Ganchev giving them full authority to act on behalf of the company.  Mr Markov used this power of attorney to have Alcarin file winding up proceedings against Meditrade.  When Mr Ganchev told Ms Spyrides of his dispute with Mr Markov she cancelled the powers of attorney and purported to annul the Meditrade winding up application.   
Associate judge Doogue said the powers of attorney were given to allow individual shareholders to advance Alcarin’s interests.  It was not designed to give one party a tactical advantage in collateral disputes between the two shareholders, he said.  Cancellation of the power of attorney meant Mr Markov had no authority to act as Alcarin’s agent in continuing court proceedings.  The winding up proceeding was struck out.  Meditrade indicated it will be seeking court costs against Mr Markov personally.
Meditrade Ltd v. Alcarin Ltd – High Court (22.03.16)

16.049