23 August 2017

Liquidation: re Rayland Investments

Fees claimed by Auckland insolvency practitioner Mark Norrie were cut in half by the High Court for unnecessary work done on the liquidation of property developer Rayland Investments Ltd.
Associate judge Bell described the claimed $32,900 liquidation fees as going beyond work done in the interests of company creditors but instead advancing the liquidator’s own personal interests.  The High Court was told Rayland Investments was put into liquidation by a creditor owed $68,500.  On learning of the Mr Norrie’s appointment as liquidator, Rayland Investment’s owner Mr Larry Fan indicated that cash would be put into the company to clear all debts.  Unsuccessful negotiations between the two followed with Mr Norrie putting a tight deadline on demands Mr Fan sign what Judge Bell called a one-sided settlement deed.  Mr Fan was to front up with $100,000 in cash with penalty interest at 29 per cent, compounding monthly, for late payment.  Mr Norrie’s duties or his remuneration were not specified.  Mr Fan did not sign despite Mt Norrie’s threats to report him to the Integrity and Enforcement Unit at the Companies Office.  Mr Norrie threatened to take from Mr Fan his company car, later finding the vehicle was not owned by the company.
The company’s external creditors totalled $76,500.  The High Court disallowed much of the fees and expenses claimed by Mr Norrie for continuing with the liquidation.  Judge Bell said liquidators are not entitled to payment for work not required and unnecessary.  Mr Norrie showed little interest in resolving matters. he said.  It is common practice for liquidators to put liquidation on hold where directors and shareholders are making an honest effort to raise finance to pay all creditors. It is where liquidators treat directors and shareholders with hostility and take a “play to the whistle” approach that there are disputes about liquidators’ remuneration, Judge Bell said.          
re Rayland Investments – High Court (23.08.17)

17.107