08 August 2017

Price Fixing: Commerce Commission v. Online Realty Ltd

Ray White franchisee Online Realty in Hamilton was fined $1.05 million for price fixing after colluding with other real estate agents to pass on increased Trade Me listing fees.  Pleading poverty, Online Realty has three years to pay by instalments.  Ironically, franchise owner Ray White Ltd had negotiated a suspension of Trade Me’s new fee schedule for all its agencies at a time when Online Realty needlessly implemented the price fixing agreement.
The Commerce Act prohibits cartel behaviour fixing prices.  The Commission has taken action against multiple real estate firms in the Manawatu and Waikato for their response to a 2013 Trade Me proposal to revise listing fees.  Trade Me signalled an end to its subscription model, with unlimited listing for an annual fee replaced by a fee of $180 per listing.  The High Court was told Online Realty management agreed with other Hamilton firms they too would pass on the new Trade Me listing fee to its clients.  This collusion amounted to collective price fixing.  Ray White head office had agreed with Trade Me that implementation of the new fee schedule would be delayed for all Ray White franchisees.  Online Realty could have continued operating under its existing subscription model at the time it joined the Hamilton price fixing agreement by unilaterally withdrawing all its current Trade Me listings.  Online Realty holds about nine per cent of the Hamilton residential real estate market.    
Commerce Commission v. Online Realty Ltd – High Court (8.08.17)

17.097